- Admissions Advice
- GMAT Test Prep Reviews
- Admissions MBA Consulting Reviews
The Economist GMAT Tutor Overview
The Economist GMAT Tutor
About Economist GMAT Tutor
The Economist GMAT Tutor offers guarantee at least a 70* point improvement, or your money back. They market directly to individuals on their smartphones, tablets, those on-the-move, and living in an app-based learning environment
Their GMAT tutor uses a mobile app (available for both iPhone and Android devices) to connect students with their studies, programs and other online content. When there’s no connectivity available, the app will still continue to run on it’s own. Naturally their package also comes with thousands of practice tests and essay guides.
Along with their virtual app-based tutor, there’s also individual attention available from staff members and an “Ask-A-Tutor” messaging service. They also feature a blog on their website with tips and tricks relating to GMAT testing. Their advice ranges from improving on exams to applying for scholarships.
The GMAT Economist uses a categorical type approach guiding students through each level of the exam, with personal markings given on the AWA (Analytical Writing Assessment), and then moving through to integrated reasoning, quantitative and verbal. They also use an adaptive learning model that assesses areas where the student may need more focus or improvement.
Economist GMAT Tutor Cost and Contact Info
After a seven-day free trial period, tiered plans start at $449 and $699 for a premium course and top out at a six-month plan for $989 for a “genius plan.”
Economist GMAT Tutor Promo Code
If the Economist’s GMAT Tutor program is the best test prep course for you, but you’re looking for a coupon code to save a bit of money before purchasing, check out our promo code to get a discount!
Joe Flaherty – :
The course was comprehensive and I enjoyed the adaptable teaching style. There were not any lectures or high-quality reading material, more practice-based learning. I did not get much from the 1 on 1 tutoring sessions. The guaranteed score increase drew me into the program and I did improve by over 70 points from my initial score.
Gamze Evirgen – :
It’s a great program for beginners to GMAT study. I used the free version for a week and it set a solid basis for my GMAT study. As I had limited time, I didn’t subscribe for whole tutor but I would definitely advise you to try and see the value by yourself!
Derek McIntosh – :
I felt that the course was relatively well structured and I enjoyed the teaching method. It was comprehensive, and the conversational nature of it made it feel light-hearted. I will say that the refund policy is difficult to achieve, and there is A LOT more content than you probably need to go through (need to complete >90% of the course to qualify for score increase guarantee, I completed 75% and achieved my target score, but did not hit the score increase guarantee, but I had no incentive to continue in the course to get to 90% completion.
Madison Gustin – :
I began to use this prep course about 5 weeks prior to my scheduled exam date. My first practice score was embarrassingly bad, but after a few weeks I was able to increase my score by over 300 points! It was a lot of work, but after taking the official exam, I think it was a very close example to what the exam is really like.
Meng Cui – :
I think the teaching mode is much more interactive compare to the traditional method. It does have this adaptive module which GMAT exam uses but I am not so sure about how close they are compared to the actual test.
Ernie Doherty – :
I found the Economist to be straight forward, but quite easy. It was not as comprehensive as other sources (e.g., Kaplan and Manhattan), though I found it’s writing to be up-to-par. I would say that this is a source that could be used as a supplement, but not a stand-alone.
Justin – :
The economist GMAT review raised my score from a 700 to a 760. The guaranteed score increase initially attracted me, but the interface and questions were well thought out and presented. The 1-on-1 tutoring sessions could be improved (not much value added), but overall my results merit a 5 star review.
Vishesh – :
Half baked product sold at a premium price.
I bought and used this for 2 months. Issues:
1) Not adaptive. Does not recommend daily goals based on your target score, your performance in exam or days to exam (they claim it is adaptive)
2) Too many bugs: I’ve raised 3 bugs with their team. a) UI recommending the same topic over and over again despite having finished it, b) The same review notes showing up for multiple topics, c) While giving an exam, the system would get stuck and not proceed to next question
3) Very slow response to ‘ask the tutor’ questions
FYI: They have now rebranded this to ‘bloomberg exam prep’
Jessica Commerford – :
Questions helped a lot and the explanation to answers was clear and concise.
Ryan Staples – :
Expensive and not very good. I spent over $1400 on this program and did not learn much at all. I do not recommend this product.
Greg – :
This is a good program for GMAT prep, but it is very expensive. You can easily get most of this I formation from many of the prep books out there.
tanya B – :
Helped but was expensive
Leo – :
Its a simple chat bot. Nothing special. Safe the money and get one of the prep course books. Content is the same. The program asks you to indicate the date of your gmat exam. Even though my exam was getting closer and closer the chat bot simply followed the pattern of a book. So until the last day I was studying for the quant part. There is no option to choose if you wish to study for the quant or verbal part which is really questionable and does not make sense to me…wanted to study verbal part since the exam was coming closer and closer but the program didnt let me. So it is not “intelligent” at all.Also, the practice tests of the economist tutor are a way easier than the original practice tests.
…all in all, I seriously regret having bought this program. Stay with the original books + any guide and you will do fine.
Deen Amin – :
Gives a lot of practice for math and verbal and has a great score guarantee policy.
Amy Jarvis – :
Solid test prep for getting me familiar with test format and types of questions.
Bo – :
It was a very helpful tool for my preparation. I would recommend using it.
Harshad Dahake – :
I had got the trial version of Economist GMAT Tutor. Their interface is very effective in helping you learn and strengthen each concept. The clear division of topics lets you understand each tip and trick the best way possible and provides extra practice in an intelligent manner (adaptive!) Would recommend anyone who wants to score high on GMAT!
Alix Farhat – :
It’s as much as you put into it. Opportunities for personal 1:1 coaching were great to use towards the end and narrow in on specific problems
Lindsay S – :
I found the test prep practice questions to be incredibly helpful! They got me into the rhythm of answering GMAT questions.
Alexis – :
Don’t use the Economist Gmat, it is a complete scam, they charge you way too much for what it is, You can find way cheaper preps online that are way better than the Economist.
Bilin Chen – :
I used this program briefly. The simulation test is good. It gives you a good idea about where you stands. I also used the Grammer and found it to be helpful.
Wensley Barker – :
Thoroughly appreciated the adaptive nature of the software that targets your identified weakest areas and emphasizes questions in that particular area. Could improve by offering question banks for immediate practice versus embedded questions in course.
Apm105 – :
The Economst GMAT review offered money back if you didn’t improve your score at least 60 points. This advertisement is why I choose it because of the money back guarantee. However to actually be eligible for the money back was extremely time consuming and distracting. I believe that this incentive actually negatively impacted my score.
Bruce – :
Flexible and well designed.
Steph – :
It’s a good starting point, but you’ll exhaust most of the content pretty quickly. I remember it being less expensive when I signed up for it – I think the $700+ price point is absurd. I wouldn’t subscribe for six months – I signed up for three and that was more than enough time to nail down the basics and figure out where I really needed help.
Grant O. – :
This prep course was super helpful in providing shortcuts and tips on how to study and master the more difficult questions. The course is well-organized and designed to help you achieve your best possible score on the GMAT. Be sure to practice over and over!
Jonathan D – :
THE ECONOMIST GMAT COURSE WAS VERY HELPFUL IN PROVIDING TRICKS, SHORTCUTS, AND PROCESSES TO DEAL WITH THE MOST COMMON AND MOST MISSSED QUESTIONS. I FOUBD THE MATH SEGWMENTS PARTICULARLY USEFUL IN THIS REGARD. THE COURSE IS WELL PACED, ORGANIZED, AND THE APP IS VERY WELL PUT TOGETHER.
JP – :
I found the service to be quite good. it was clear and easy to follow along. The guides were great and overall I would recommend. I did find it a tad pricey for the service, but on the whole it was okay.
J – :
Easy to use software. Focuses on improving your weaknesses and sets you up for the exam perfectly.
Dahlia – :
I found the economist Gmat tutor to be ExtRemely useful – the modules are adaptive and Thus tailor themselVes to work on your weaknesses once you complete the diagnostic tests. This saves you Prep time by helping you focus on areas you need the most help with. Good number of Realistic practice tests too which i found came closest to my actual score once i sat for the TeSt. A bit expEnsiVe reLative to other prep courses but the option to do a trial period helps you see if the Format is suited to your needs.
DtK – :
free tests are very useful and were accurate compared to my actual test results. I would recommend signing up based on that alone. the app was also useful in being able to refresh certain concepts in 5 or 10 minute increments and helped cement understanding. HOWEVER, practice material was minimally useful for more experienced test takers. It definitely helped expand knowledge but not necessarily worth the squeeze. The real problem is the limited explanations on why practice problems were right or wrong. the online tutors were not very responsive or helpful. while the practice tests and app are worthwhile, I think time would be better spent working problems in various books instead.
mja332 – :
Found the economist resources very useful in identifying my relative strengths and weaknesses. IN addition, the online resources were very helpful in strengthening areas that were identified.
JG262 – :
Thanks to The Economist GMAT tool i was able to increase my gmat score from 570 to 690, which eventually got me accepted at my target school. It is great for those who have busy lives as it allows you to select short sessions when you are sitting on the train to work or waiting for friends. the program is adaptive and therefore helps you focus more on your weaknesses. Explanations are usually clear and teach you how the gmat test reasons. One downside is that there is no list of all theory/principles which makes it sometimes difficult retrieve any piece of theory you wish to revise.
Kartik Chaturvedi – :
The service was excellent. The course adapted to my weaknesses and helped me overcome obstacles that stumped me. The math was great and had a lot of questions on each topic. Verbal was easy and taught in an easy to understand way. My score went from 680 to 710 because of this course. Highly recommended
yllenzz – :
I signed up for their trial which let you take a mock GMAT test for free. In my experience, their mock test is not as similar to the mock test provided by Manhattan. It is still useful however, especially if you are still early in the preparation stage. I do not know it’s worth paying the price for the tutor service, however.
Erin – :
The Economist GMAT prep worked well for me. I didn’t love how it switched back and forth between quant and verbal, since the test doesn’t do that, but there are ways to work through the program on your own to focus only on one section at a time. I wish I had used the tutoring sessions earlier, too. Overall it’s a solid program and I got the score I wanted.
KMize – :
I absolutely loved this program–the way they timed you on the math questions was hugely helpful. Bonus: they have a money-back guarantee if your score doesn’t improve by a certain amount–be sure to read the fine print on this one and it could save you a lot of money!
Benji – :
Great program for self learners. Tests were accurate and plentiful. Loved the predictive score forecast with confidence bounds.
Kevin – :
This program was great for both a long term plan and a weekend of crash studying. I would recommend this to anyone who is going to take the GMAT. The best thing about this program is that you actually learn in the context of questions from the exam but not from questions only..
Yegor – :
The Economist gamified GMAT preparation process making me well engaged through this not-the-most-exciting experience. Not sure I could get my 760 without their beautiful interactive program.
Yuki – :
Good for practicing questions on line, so that you can be prepared for the real test. Also, gives a personal analysis on performance, which helped me prepare efficiently.
Kartik Chaturvedi – :
Economist was great! It does a fantastic job of building up from the basics. Every topic covered has a number of practice problems and the test adapts to your weaknesses and builds on them. I would highly recommend this course.
The tests seem to poorly coded. I got one test where the entire quant section was only one type of problems (data sufficiency).
Alex – :
This was a fairly decent tool that provided easy on the go ways to prepare for the GMAT. That said, it could use some improvements. Notably it would be better if you could move back and forth more freely in each section. Second, the ability to print hard copies or have more access to your underlying data would be extremely helpful. Finally, more access to experts and live tutors beyond the minimum provided would be helpful, as some concepts are just easier explained by a human being.
David Boa – :
The Economist GMAT Tutor was the absolute best prep course I found while going through the studying process. The interactive nature of the program allowed for personalized structure and the ability to focus on your weaker areas of the GMAT test.
Ayonna – :
The Economist GMAT Tutor site was phenomenal. It definitely aided in preparing me for the GMAT. It hones in very specific tools and strategies needed to excel at this test. This prep also aided in identifying your strengths and weaknesses. Once your weaknesses were identified, it targeted areas that you should work on. The site provided practice tests that were similar to actual GMAT test. Being afforded the opportunity to take a practice test very similar to the actual test made it easier to navigate through the real test. This site took everything step by step to ensure the GMAT would not be overwhelming.
Collin Burton – :
I absolutely LOVED this program. I’m a dad with 3 kids, so finding a long chunk of time to study was hard. I mostly had 15 minutes here and there. With this program, I didn’t have to spend time setting things up. I simply told it how long I had to study, and the program would automatically build a study session for me. The software adapts to your weak areas, so you know you’re being efficient with your time.
Timing was also a big issue for me. I tended to spend too long on questions. The Economist GMAT tutor has a lot of great features to help out with that so you learn how to gauge your time per question.
I used another very popular program and it didn’t help me at all. I wish I would have done The Economist GMAT program first.
Christine Rasmussen – :
I love how adaptive it was and how it helped me focus on the areas where I needed the most help. I also found the tips they included incredibly useful. I studied for the GMAT on a tight timetable and this was by far the most useful preparation software I found.
Sean Walsh – :
I really liked the GMAT adaptability software. Moreover, I liked the interface, it encouraged you to work through your problems. I found near the end however, it got a little repetitive and I started to plateau and it didn’t have great tools to get me across the plateau. That said, it was still a great instruction system for people of all levels. I was looking for a tool to help me get 700+ and it did that and more.
Thato Keineetse – :
Really convenient but my actual score was far below my indicative score.
Keshav GOEL – :
I LIked the ability to focus on the areas where I needed Improvement. I loved the layout. IT was interactive and simple to use